• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
The Grazingland Animal Nutrition Lab logo

Grazingland Animal Nutrition Lab

Laboratory offering decision support for better nutritional management of livestock and stewardship of natural resources

  • GAN Lab: Grazingland Animal Nutrition Laboratory
    • GAN Lab Services
    • FNIRS/NUTBAL Sampling Contracts for USDA/NRCS Customers
    • Pricing and Sampling Information
    • Additional Information on Nutritional Monitoring
    • GAN Lab FAQ
    • Lab Staff
    • Contact Us
  • Decision Support Systems
    • NIRS: Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy
    • NUTBAL: Livestock nutrition balance decision support system
    • FRAMS: Forage risk assessment management system
    • BRASS: Burning risk assessment support system
    • LMIS: Livestock marketing information system
    • PestMan: Brush and weed management decisions for Texas and New Mexico
    • PHYGROW: Phyto mass growth model
  • Projects
    • USDA Forest Service BRASS: Burning Risk Advisory Support System
    • Mali Livestock and Pastoralist Initiative
    • Mongolia LEWS: Livestock Early Warning System
    • East Africa LEWS: Livestock Early Warning System
  • Publications
  • Careers
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Additional Information on Nutritional Monitoring

Enhancing Nutritional Monitoring: Strategies for Informed Grazing and Feeding Management


At the most basic level, nutritional monitoring to inform grazing, habitat, and or feeding management decisions involves determination of quantity and quality of available forage. Forage quantity (weight per unit area) and quality (nutrient concentration) can be obtained relatively easily by harvesting above ground standing crop samples representative of the pasture in question and then having these samples analyzed at one of the many reputable forage testing laboratories.

This method works reasonably well in monoculture pastures and or low diversity rangelands where animal diet selectivity is limited. Even so, depending on a variety of factors (notably stocking rate), grazing animals will still exhibit some level of attraction for new-live-leaf and thus select a higher quality diet than the average for available forage. In this case, “hand plucking” or sampling plant tissue for analysis that mimics the diet selected by resident grazing animals will yield a more accurate estimate of nutritional status. The method will also require more time and skill from the manager. Emerging remote sensing techniques may also be applied to estimate forage quantity and quality. Many of these tools are readily available at regional to local scales.

All of the aforementioned methods are useful in making informed grazing or nutritional management decisions; each has its advantages and disadvantages (Table 1).



If your management objectives include obtaining knowledge of what your animals are selecting from the forage available on your operation, and how your management is providing for their nutritional needs in real time, then a monitoring method that accounts for individual animal selectivity in a specific time and place is called for. Hand plucking will provide that information if you have the time and experience.

Alternatively, a manager can let the animals inform this process by collecting fecal samples. Fecal chemistry is related to diet chemistry (Figure 1). Fecal samples can be collected in concert with other routine farm/ranch chores such as putting out feed or minerals.



*Please contact us at the Gan Lab for more information concerning sampling strategies and contract structure.

A member of
Texas A&M AgriLife

Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service | Texas A&M AgriLife Research | Texas A&M Forest Service | Texas A&M AgriLife Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Lab | College of Agriculture & Life Sciences

Grazingland Animal Nutrition Lab

Compact with Texans | Privacy and Security | Accessibility Policy | State Link Policy | Statewide Search | Veterans Benefits | Military Families | Risk, Fraud & Misconduct Hotline | Texas Homeland Security | Texas Veteran's Portal | Equal Opportunity | Open Records/Public Information